Standards & Accreditation
Faraday shielding is not a product decision, it is a compliance decision. ACPO Principles, the FSR Codes of Practice, ISO/IEC 17025 and MOD JSP 440 all point at the same requirement: prove that seized digital evidence was never altered while in your care, and prove it with documentation a court or auditor will accept.
This category unpacks each of those frameworks in plain operational terms — what they actually ask of you, what evidence you need to keep on file, and where signal blocking sits inside a wider validation and audit story.
Every article links across to the field procedures, lab storage and procurement routes that make compliance achievable in practice. If you need help mapping the kit in our Catalogue to a specific accreditation scope, get in touch with Andover Forensics and we will walk it through with you.
ACPO Digital Evidence Principles Explained
The four ACPO principles in plain English — what they mean for daily practice, and how Faraday isolation sits inside them.
FSR Codes of Practice and Faraday Shielding
What the Forensic Science Regulator's Codes of Practice expect from RF isolation kit and how to evidence compliance.
MOD JSP 440 and Operational Shielding
Where Faraday equipment fits within MOD's defence security policy framework — secure handling of seized or compromised electronics.
Ask About Standards & Accreditation
Andover Forensics Assistant
Typically replies in a few seconds